IN4MATX
131 Term Project
The aim of this term project
is to evaluate the usability of a search interface of the UCI library
website. The
project should be carried out by pairs of two students, one being the "experimenter" and
the other the "test user" or "subject". The
result of the project is a written report that describes how the test
user interacted with these interfaces to solve given tasks, as well as
the
interface design and information
organization problems that you encountered thereby. The term papers are due
by December
8 at 11:59pm at the latest (to be uploaded electronically in the ICS 104
dropbox). The estimated work time per person is one hour for the experiment,
2-3 hours for analyzing
the interface, and less than a day for
writing the report.
This project will be conducted
in collaboration with the UCI libraries which also supplied the
tasks. The library will be very eager to read your findings.
Tasks: See
the separate sheet of instructions for the experimenter that will be
distributed in class. Experimenters should not share these instructions
with the subjects beforehand.
How
to proceed:
- You will need paper
and a pen for the experimenter to take notes. If you have a voice recorder
(e.g. cassette recorder, voice recording software on your computer) that
can record for about an hour, this would also be useful.
- One student is the
test user who should solve the given tasks alone.
- The other is
the experimenter who notes down all important actions/comments of the user,
specifically when the user has problems.
- This user should think
aloud, i.e. explain permanently whatever s/he is currently doing
and why, and whatever comes to his or her mind. A fictitious example
would
be: "Now
I need to find the books by Peter Norvig. I look for a way to
enter his name
in a search field. However, I cannot find one. Let us browse through
these pulldown-menus to figure out how this can be done...."
- When the user is done
with all tasks,
both partners should re-analyse the problems that the user encountered
and
document
them with screenshots.
- If you have suggestions
for improvements, also note them down (suggesting improvements is not very
important though).
- Write a report of about
12 single-spaced pages (8 pages of text plus 4 pages of screendumps). It
will be graded based on
- the clarity of
the description of what the user did and what problems s/he encountered
- the thoughtfullness
of your analysis of why these problems occurred
- the thoughtfulness
of your recommendations for improvement (less important)
- Upload your report
electronically by Dec.
8 at 11:59pm the ICS 104 dropbox.
Some
advice:
- Do not hesitate to
speak out everything that comes to your mind. You do not have to be a
brilliant
user. This project is not about you, but about the interface. As many of
you already experienced, even the brightest users encounter problems if
the user
interface is not well designed.
- I
plan to forward your reports to the UCI library, so that they can decide
on necessary improvements. Please therefore criticize
whatever you find problematic with the interface, but do it politely (and
do not blame the programmers :-). Do not include your student IDs in your
report. If you tell me so, I will leave out your names when
forwarding your report.
- Recording
the user's comments on tape is useful for later analyzing usability problems.
This
is not required though.
- Your
criticism and recommendations should be based on HCI and web design guidelines
presented in class (but you are welcome to also present a few personal
opinions that are
not
grounded
in
HCI theory).