FACULTY COURSE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Computer Science and Engineering 2019-20
CS 161 Design and Analysis of Algorithms
Academic Term: Fall 2019 Instructor: Shindler, Michael
Student Outcome Indicators (evaluations of CSE students only):
For each student outcome indicator, identify (1) the assignment (which quiz, quiz problem, exam problem, or project) was used to assess that indicator, (2) the maximum score possible on that assignment, (3) the performance standard for that assignment expressed in points and also as a percentage of max, (4) the number of CSE students who were assessed on that assignment, (5) the average score achieved by them expressed in points and percentage of max, and (6) the number and percentage of CSE students who achieved the performance standard.
This course assesses Outcome Indicators C1a, C2a, C2b.
C1a – Students have an ability to analyze a complex computing problem and apply principles of computing and other disciplines to identify solutions
C2a – Students have an ability to design and implement a computing solution to meet computing requirements
C2b – Students have an ability to evaluate a computing solution to determine whether it meets computing requirements
Student Outcome Indicator
Assignm't used for assessing students
Max score avail
Performance standard score and % of Max
# of CSE students tested
Average score and % of Max
# and % of CSE students who met the standard
C1a
Exam 1, Q7
6
3=50%
26
3.77=62.8%
18=69%
C2a
Exam 2, Q4
10
6=60%
7.27=72.7%
19=73%
C2b
Final, Q2a
3
3=100%
26=100%
What changes did you make in this course based on previous assessment results?
What recommendations do you have for improving the course the next time it is taught?
What recommendations do you have, if any, regarding prerequisite courses or other ways to improve student preparation for this course?
Note any Outcome Indicators for which under 70% of CSE students met the standard. What are the plans to address these issues?